<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>indiWiz.com &#187; bzr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indiwiz.com/tag/bzr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indiwiz.com</link>
	<description>Subhash&#039;s Tech Log</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 15:11:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why I like bzr over git and hg</title>
		<link>http://indiwiz.com/2009/12/29/why-i-like-bzr-over-git-and-hg/</link>
		<comments>http://indiwiz.com/2009/12/29/why-i-like-bzr-over-git-and-hg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 06:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Subhash Chandran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software Dev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bzr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[git]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indiwiz.com/?p=600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I posted in Twitter that my favorite DVCS is bzr. Immediately Manish asked me why not git or hg. Here is the answer: git I love GitHub. I use git regularly. But when compared to bzr, I love bzr more. Why? I find git&#8217;s SHA based version numbering cryptic. The default installation of git [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><p>Recently I posted in Twitter that my favorite <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_revision_control">DVCS</a> is bzr. Immediately <a href="http://twitter.com/ManishChaks">Manish</a> asked me why not git or hg. Here is the answer:</p>
<h4>git</h4>
<p>I love <a href="http://github.com/">GitHub</a>. I use git regularly. But when compared to bzr, I love bzr more. Why? I find git&#8217;s SHA based version numbering cryptic. The default installation of git does not support command shortcuts (like <tt>st</tt> for <tt>status</tt>, <tt>ci</tt> for <tt>commit</tt>) which I am used to from my svn days (fact: this can be manually set using <a href="http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/Aliases">git alias</a>).</p>
<h4>hg</h4>
<p>This choice does not have any rational backing! I did not like odd-sounding <tt>hg</tt> in the command prompt. <tt>bzr</tt> sounded more natural to me.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-600"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indiwiz.com/2009/12/29/why-i-like-bzr-over-git-and-hg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

